Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Magarpatta Township Development and… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2009)

Home
Bombay HC
2009
Magarpatta Township Development and Construction ComMagarpatta Township Development and Construction Company Lim

Disposed

Magarpatta Township Development and Construction Company Limited v. the Union of India and Ors.

Bombay HC23 Jun 2009CAW/51/2009

Case brief

from the order text

What is this about?

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE…

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Disposed

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

A

Mgn

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.51 OF 2009 IN

WRIT PETITION NO.5974 OF 2008

Magarpatta Township Development & Construction Company Ltd.

..Petitioner

Vs.

Union of India & Ors.

..Respondents

Mr. Prakash Shah i/b. PDS Legal for the petitioners.

CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & J.H. BHATIA, JJ.

DATED : 23RD JUNE, 2009

P.C.

None present for the respondents. The Application is for amendment on account of subsequent events. Considering that, Civil Application allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Amendment to be carried out within one week from today. Civil Application disposed of accordingly.

Considering that at the time Rule was issued the respondents have appeared it is presumed that the respondents have waived service. Hence no Bhatta charges be asked from the petitioners.

(J.H. BHATIA,J.)

(F.I. REBELLO,J.)

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Magarpatta Township Development & Construction Company Ltd.
respondent
Union of India

Coram

AI extract

F.I. Rebello
J.H. Bhatia

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Bombay HC
Decided on: 23 Jun 2009 · June
Registered: 9 Jan 2009
Case no.: CAW/51/2009
CNR: HCBM010000592009
Topic: Civil Procedure and Limitation
Bench: J.h. Bhatia F.i. Rebello
Disposal: Allowed

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from J.h. Bhatia F.i. Rebello

Baun Foundation Trust Vs Central Board of Direct Taxes, Delhi and Ors.
22 Jun 2009
M/S. Alankar Interiors Vs the State of Maharashtra and 2 Ors.
22 Jun 2009
Union of India and Anr. Vs Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai Bench (D) and Anr.
22 Jun 2009
M/S. Seco Tools (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India and Ors.
23 Jun 2009
Union of India and Ors. Vs Seher Exim Pvt. Ltd.
23 Jun 2009
M/S. Bhav Shakti Steelmines Pvt.Ltd. Vs Union of India and Ors.
23 Jun 2009

Cite this judgement

Magarpatta Township Development and Construction Company Limited v. the Union of India and Ors., CAW/51/2009 (BOM), decided on 23 June 2009.

The Bombay High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

F.I. Rebello and J.H. Bhatia

Parties & counsel