Disposed
Narayan Vishnu Paithankar v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Bombay HCCAW/2373/2009
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Application for early hearing of a writ petition was rejected by the court.
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PDP
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET APPELLATE SIDE
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2373 OF 2009 IN
CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 8166 OF 2005
Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court's or Judge's orders of Coram, appearance, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
Mr. V.P. Vaidya for applicant.
Mr. S.D. Rayrikar, AGP for respondent no.1. Mrs. Manisha Shekhar for respondent no.2.
November 04, 2009.
P.C.
This application has been moved for early hearing of Writ Petition No. 8166 of 2005 and the learned counsel for the applicant stated that the applicant is a senior citizen. However, this submission is not supported from the record as the applicant’s age in the petition memo was shown 46 years.
Hence, the application is rejected.
(R.Y. GANOO,J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.)
Applicant
Respondent no.1
Respondent no.2
R.Y. Ganoo
B.H. Marlappalle
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court