Civil Application for intervention allowed as applicant is a recognised Union. Case disposed of.
Civil Application for intervention allowed; application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3 OF 2009
In
WRIT PETITION NO.8601 OF 2003
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes,Office Memoranda of
Coram,appearances,Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and Registrar’s
orders
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mr.Sunil V. Prabhu for the applicant.
Mr.K.S.Bapat for respondent no.1.
Ms Prachi Mhatre i/b.
M/s.M.S.Bodhanwala & Co.,for resp.no.2.
CORAM : S.A. BOBDE, J.
DATE : FEBRUARY 18, 2009.
There is no dispute that the
applicant has become a recognised Union.
Hence, this Civil Application for
intervention is allowed. Civil
Application stands disposed of.
S.A. BOBDE, J.
Sunil V. Prabhu
K.S. Bapat
Prachi Mhatre
S.A. Bobde
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court