Application for amendment of a family of writ petitions to admit three additional applicants as interveners was disposed of by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay.
Application disposed of; interveners permitted to intervene.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
mss
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1910 OF 2009
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 3218 OF 2009
MAHARASHTRA KRISHNA VALLEY DEVELOPMENT CORPN. LTD.
.. .. PETITIONERS
Vs.
THE DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER PUNE DIVISION & ORS. .. .. RESPONDENTS
AND
SMT. SAMINDRABAI JAGANNATH PHADTARE & ORS.
Mr. P. J. Pawar for applicants/Interveners
Mr. Vijay Patil for the petitioners Mr. V. S. Gokhale, AGP Mr. G. S. Godbole for R
CORAM: SMT. RANJANA DESAI &
A. A. SAYED, JJ. DATED: 18/8/2009
P.C.
Heard learned advocate for the applicant/intervener, learned counsel for the
petitioners and learned counsel for the respondents.
(Smt. Ranjana Desai, J.)
(A. A. Sayed, J.)
Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Co. Ltd.
The Divisional Commissioner Pune Division
Ranjana Desai
A. A. Sayed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
