Two-judge bench rejected a civil application challenging an order dated 18th December 2008, holding that the petitioner had already been adequately protected in the underlying writ petition.
Civil Application No. 1832 of 2009 rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1832 OF 2009
IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4784 OF 2008
Moreshwar s/o Sitaramji Raut ... Applicant/Ori.Petnr.
Vs
Ms. Seema Sarnaik for the applicant.
Mr. Vinay Masurkar, GP, for the respondent No.3
CORAM: S.B. MHASE &
R.M. SAVANT, JJ.
DATED : 24TH JULY, 2009.
P.C.:
Sd/Sd/- (R.M. SAVANT) (S.B. MHASE, J.)
Moreshwar s/o Sitaramji Raut
The Hon’ble Principal District & Sessions Judge, Nagpur-1
S.B. MHASE
R.M. SAVANT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
