Allowed
Anwar Hussein J.Thim v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Bombay HCCAW/1661/2009
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE
Civil Application No.1661 of 2009
IN
Writ Petition No.4320 of 2005
Shri Anwar Hussein J. Thim
.... Applicant
(Orig. Petitioner)
v/s.
1.The State of Mah. & ors...Respondents
Mr.Durgaprasad S. Sabnis i/by Mr.Amit Saklikar for
Applicant.
Mrs.D.Raunikar, AGP for Res.Nos.1 to 3.
Ms.Manishsha Shekhar i/by M/s. Shekhar & Co. for Res.No.4.
CORAM : B.H. MARLAPALLE &
SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, JJ.
Dated : 27th July, 2009
P.C. :
1.Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.2.The Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).3.Memo in the above Writ Petition No.4320 of 2005 be amended accordingly within two weeks.4.Additional reply, if any, be filed by the Respondents within four weeks.[SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, J.][B.H. MARLAPALLE, J.]
Shri Anwar Hussein J. Thim
The State of Mah.
B.H. Marlapalle
Roshan Dalvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court