The High Court of Bombay, Civil Appellate Jurisdiction, in Civil Application No. 1595 of 2009 (Review in Writ Petition No. 7500 of 2007), allowed a necessary amendment in the pending matter and directed that it be carried out forthwith.
Amendment allowed; necessary amendment to be carried out forthwith.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1595 OF 2009
IN
REVIEW PETITION NO. 4 OF 2009
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 7500 OF 2007
The Commissioner,
Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation. .. Petitioner.
(Orig. Respondent No.1)
vs.
Anjuman Khairul-Islam Trust & Ors. .. Respondents.
Respondent No.1.
(Orig. Petitioner)
Mr. R.S. Apte, Sr. Adv., i/by A.A. Garge
for review petitioner.
Mr. S.G. Kudle for Respondent No. 1.
Smt. Sunanda R. Kumbhat for Respondent No. 2.
Ms. M.P. Thakur, AGP., for Respondent / State.
CORAM : J.N. PATEL &
S. J. KATHAWALA, JJ.
DATE : 3RD JULY, 2009.
(IN CHAMBER AT 2.45 P.M.)
2
P.C. :
Heard.
carried out forthwith.
(J.N. PATEL, J.)
(S. J. KATHAWALA, J.)
The Commissioner, Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation
Anjuman Khairul-Islam Trust
J.N. PATEL
S. J. KATHAWALA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
