This order condones the delay in filing a civil application based on affidavit reasons and lists the Letters Patent Appeal for admission. The counsel for respondents waives service.
Delay in filing the civil application is condoned; the Letters Patent Appeal is listed for admission on 26.3.2009.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 291 OF 2008
IN
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL ST. NO. 21420 OF 2008
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 2430 OF 2002
Udhav Mahadeo Gaikwad. .. Petitioner.
vs.
Rashtriya Shikshan Sangh
& Ors. .. Respondents.
Mr. Macchindra Patil for Petitioner.
Mr. S.S. Pakale for Respondent Nos. 1 & 2.
Mr. R.M. Patne, AGP., for Respondent Nos. 3 to 5.
CORAM: J.N. PATEL, &
SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI,JJ.
DATE: 6TH FEBRUARY, 2009.
P.C.
. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
2. For the reasons recorded in the affidavit in
support of the civil application for condonation of
delay, the delay is condoned. The Letters Patent
Appeal be listed for admission on 26.3.2009. The
2
learned counsel for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 waives
service. The learned AGP., waives service for
Respondent Nos. 3 to 5.
(J.N. Patel, J.)
(Smt. V.K. Tahilramani, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether condonation of delay can be allowed based on affidavit reasons recorded in support of the application.
Udhav Mahadeo Gaikwad
Rashtriya Shikshan Sangh
Ors.
J.N. Patel
V.K. Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court