Application for condonation of delay in filing Letters Patent Appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-appearance of the applicant, leading to disposal of the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 285 OF 2009
IN LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2031 OF 2007
Shri Mahadu Baburao Pasalkar. .. Applicant Vs Velhe Taluka Jai Malhar & Ors. .. Respondents
None for the Applicant.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & A.M. KHANWILKAR, J DATED : 24TH NOVEMBER, 2009
P.C.
This is an application for condonation of delay in filing the Letters Patent Appeal. Nobody is present on behalf of the Applicant. Dismissed for want of prosecution. In view of dismissal of the present application, Letters Patent Appeal accordingly stands
disposed of.
CHIEF JUSTICE
A.M. KHANWILKAR, J
Shri Mahadu Baburao Pasalkar
Velhe Taluka Jai Malhar & Ors.
Swatanter Kumar
A.M. Khanwilkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
