Application allowed to implead applicant in PIL regarding tender matter. Order lists petition and directs issue of rejoinder and reply. Disposes of procedural requirement only.
Application allowed; applicant directed to be impleaded as Respondent No.7 in the Petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 127 OF 2009 IN
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 235 of 2009
Shri Harshad Gawade ..Petitioner
v/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
..Respondents
And
M/s. The Luxury Holidays. ..Applicant.
Shri Janak Dwarkadas, Sr. Counsel i/b. Ms. Neha Palshikar for the petitioner.
Shri A.H.Palekar-AGP for the State.
Ms. Sheetal Sabnis i/b Gagrat for respondent no.6. Shri U.P. Chaudhary a/w. Ms. Komal Joshi i/b. M/s. Khaitan & Jaykar for the applicant in C.A. 127/09.
CORAM:- SWATANTER KUMAR,CJ. AND A.M.KHANWILKAR, J
DATED :- NOVEMBER 26, 2009.
P.C.
to be impleaded as Respondent No.7 in the Petition.
2
CHIEF JUSTICE
A.M.KHANWILKAR, J
Shri Harshad Gawade
The State of Maharashtra
M/s. The Luxury Holidays
Swatanter Kumar
A.M. Khanwilkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
