Applicant challenged compliance with a prior PIL order. Court found representations indicated compliance was underway and to inform applicant. Application disposed with no order as to costs.
Application disposed; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12 OF 2009 IN
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 83 OF 2008
Ravindra Mahadev Desai ).. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra and others ).. Respondents
Mr. Vikas Shivarkar for the Applicant.
Mr. Nitin P. Deshpande, Assistant Government Pleader, for the State.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. AND
A.M. KHANWILKAR, J. DATED : 21ST AUGUST 2009
P.C.
The learned Counsel appearing for the State submits that the Order of the Court dated 24th July 2008 has been complied with to some extent as they have already formulated the data. He submits that it is an on going process and will take some time. He, however, states that the concerned authority will inform the Applicant within two weeks from today.
CHIEF JUSTICE
A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.
Ravindra Mahadev Desai
The State of Maharashtra
SWATANTER KUMAR
A.M. KHANWILKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
