Anantrao Shamrao Holikar v. Tukaram Gopalrao Suryawanshi
Bombay HCCA/547/2009
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
1
¶2
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
¶3
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
¶4
CA NO.547/2009 IN SA NO.586/2000.
¶5
Office notes, office Memoranda of
¶6
Coram,appearances, Court’s orders
¶7
Court’s or Judge’s orders.
¶8
or directions and Registrar’s orders
¶9
.Heard both counsel.
¶10
There is delay of 401 days in
¶11
causing to make application to bring
legal representatives of deceased
Tukaram, sole respondent, on record. The
delay is sufficiently explained, not
deliberate, it is condoned. Abatement
setaside.Namesoflegal
representativesdisclosedinthe
¶12
application be brought on record within
fourteen days. The application allowed
as above.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court