This order allowed a civil application sought to set aside a default dismissal and condone a four-day delay. The court permitted the application with no order as to costs.
Application allowed to set aside default dismissal and condone delay of four days; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5405 OF 2009 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO.6945 OF 2005 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO.7944 OF 2003
________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders |
This application is filed for setting aside the order dated 19th December, 2008 by which the civil application No.6945 of 2005 was dismissed in default, as also for condonation of delay of 4 days caused in filing the application.
2 Heard Shri R.S. Shinde, learned Counsel for the applicant and Shri R.B. Dhaware, learned Counsel for respondent no.2.
3 Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (B) with no order as to costs.
26.11.2009.
PLK/*
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to condone a four-day delay in filing the application and allow the dismissal of the related Civil Application to be set aside?
applicant
respondent no.2
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
