Applications bearing CA Nos. 3254/2004 and 10570/2008 made to fix an early date of hearing of 1st appeal (SA No. 533 of 1991) were allowed. Proceeding noted due to non-appearance of counsel for the appellant.
Two applications were allowed for fixing an early date of hearing of the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CA NOS.3254/2004; 10570/2008 in SA NO.533 OF 1991.
Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders
Court’s or Judge’s orders.
or directions and Registrar’s orders
CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J.
DATE : 10th July, 2009.
.Two applications are made by Mr.
Nagargoje for fixing early date of
hearing of the appeal. I do not see that
there is any illusory aspect in such
applications as the matter is of 1991.
These two applications are accordingly
allowed.
Since the counsel for appellant
absent, S.O to 10th August, 2008.
bdv/ca3254.04
Nagargoje
K.U. CHANDIWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court