The Bombay High Court disposed of six arbitration petitions by directing the petitioner to initiate an appropriate proceeding without specifying further details.
Direction to the petitioner to take out appropriate proceeding.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ARBITRATION PETITION NO.448 OF 2008
WITH
ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 449 OF 2008
WITH
ARBITRATION PETITION NO.450 OF 2008
WITH
ARBITRATION PETITION NO.452 OF 2008
WITH
ARBITRATION PETITION NO.454 OF 2008
WITH
ARBITRATION PETITION NO.455 OF 2008
Tata Motors Ltd....Petitioner
Vs.
Raj Tours Pvt.Ltd....Respondent
Mr.Chinmay Gupte i/b. Mohit Gadkari and Co. for
Petitioner
Mr. Sagar Chaouhan for Respondent
Mr.K.L. Vyas Court Receiver present
CORAM: V.M. KANADE J.
DATED: 15TH OCTOBER, 2009
P.C.
1.The Petitioner is directed to take out appropriate
proceeding.
1 issue framed by the court
What proceeding should the petitioner take out under the arbitration petitions Nos. 448/449/450/452/454/455 of 2008?
V.M. Kanade
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court