Applicant seeks to file a writ petition in the Nagpur Bench after a Division Bench dismissed the earlier petition and noted jurisdictional issues regarding the location of the FIR.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 70 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2285 OF 2008
Nimraj Pandharinath Vispute Vs. The Union of India & Ors.
...Applicant/Ptnr. ...Respondents
Applicant in person Ms. U.V. Kejriwal, A.P.P
CORAM: SMT. RANJANA DESAI & SHRI. R.G. KETKAR, JJ. DATED : 4TH MAY, 2009
P.C.
“The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that she has returned the papers and discharged from appearing in the case as she has no instructions.
2
2. We have perused the file. No case is made out. Even the F.I.R which is the bone of contentions, is under the Police Station of Amaravati District, which is normally taken up by the Nagpur Bench of this Court.
3. In the circumstances, the Petition is dismissed.”
(SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.)
(SHRI. R.G. KETKAR, J.)
Nimraj Pandharinath Vispute
The Union of India
Ranjana Desai
R.G. Ketkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
