This order corrects a typographical error in a previous judgment dated 6th February, 2009, changing 'Criminal Appeal No.22 of 2009' to 'Criminal Application No.22 of 2009', and reiterates the mandatory nature of the directions contained therein before disposing of the matter.
Correction of typographical error; order disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.67 OF 2009 IN
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2225 OF 2007
Devendra S. Doctor
... Applicant
Vs.
Union of India and others.
... Respondents
Applicant appears in person.
Mr. R.B. Raghuvanshi, Additional Solicitor General with Mr. V.B. Joshi and Mr. J.C. Satpute for the Union of India.
CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. DATE : 2ND MARCH, 2009
P.C.:
Matter is heard on praecipe. The typographical error that had crept in in para 6 of the order dated 6th February, 2009 to be corrected. In place of “Criminal Appeal No.22 of 2009”, “Criminal Application No.22 of 2009” shall be inserted.
CHIEF JUSTICE
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
Devendra S. Doctor
Union of India
Swatanter Kumar
Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
