The High Court of Bombay granted permission to condone a 26-day delay in filing a criminal appeal against an acquittal order, allowing the appeal on unusual terms.
Permission granted to appeal against the order of acquittal despite the 26-day delay.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
pdp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 88 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 635 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2009
The State of Maharashtra
..Applicant
Vs.
Sunil Shantaram Sapkal
..Respondent
Smt. V.R. Bhosale, APP for applicant-State.
CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE & R.Y. GANOO, JJ.
P.C.
We have heard Smt. Bhosale, the learned APP and we are inclined to condone the delay of 26 days caused in filing an application for seeking leave to appeal against the order of acquittal.
Hence, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (b).
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing an application for leave to appeal against an order of acquittal should be condoned.
The State of Maharashtra
Sunil Shantaram Sapkal
B.H. Marlappalle
R.Y. Ganoo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
