The High Court of Bombay at Aurangbad recalled its own order dismissing a petition for default and restored the petition to file upon application.
The order dismissing the petition for default is recalled and the petition is restored to file.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGBAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 810 of 2009
Office notes, office memoranda | of Coram, appearances, Court’s | orders or directions and Registrar’s | Court’s or Judge’s orders. orders |
Shri K.B. Dantal, Advocate for the applicant. Shri B.J. Sonwane, ld. A.P.P. for the State.
By our order passed today in criminal application No.1514/2009 we have restored this application to file. With the consent of the learned counsels for the parties this application is heard though it is not listed for hearing as such.
By this application, the applicant seeks recall of the order of this Court dated 19.11.2008 dismissing the petition for default. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties and for the reasons stated therein this application is allowed and the order of this Court dismissing the petition for default is recalled and petition is restored to file.
(R.K.DESHPANDE) (P.V.HARDAS) JUDGE JUDGE Dt : 10/06/2009
aaa/office/criappln1810.09
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the order dismissing a petition for default should be recalled and the petition restored to file.
K.B. Dantal
State
R.K. DESHPANDE
P.V. HARDAS
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
