Dismissed
The State of Mah and Ors. v. Jai Digambarrao Gunjkar
Bombay HCAPPLN/447/2009
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION No 447/2009
(State Vs. Dr. Jai)
Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or
Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s
or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders
...
CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J.
DATE:27/8/2009
...
P.C.:
1.Heard learned A.P.P. Mr.
D.R.Korde and Mr. J.V.Deshpande,
Counsel for the respondent/accused.
2.Counsel for the accused has
tendered affidavit in reply of the
accused Dr.Jain with certified copy
of the order passed by learned
AdditionalSessionsJudge4,
Aurangabad, on 28.7.2009 wherein
the accused/applicant was directed
to be released on bail on executing
P.R. bond of Rs.15,000/ with one
surety of like amount for each of
them.
3.In the situation, since
the prayer by the State is
cancellation of bail granted in
2
terms of Section 438 of Cr.P.C.
itself being not maintainable, the
application lacks merit, it is
rejected.
JUDGE
agp/44709crapl
...
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a bail application under Section 438 CrPC is maintainable when the accused has already been granted bail.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
State
Dr. Jain
K.U.CHANDIWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court