The court allowed two criminal applications filed by first cousins regarding a mutual altercation over a Guava tree. After the parties settled the dispute, the court granted bail to both applicants in connected complaints.
Both applicants released on bail in C.R. Nos. 72 and 73 of 2009 in Rs 5000/- each with one or two sureties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JUTISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4233 OF 2009
Mr. Sachin Ramgonda Patil .... Applicant.
V/s
The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent.
Mr. Vijay Killedar for the applicant. Mrs. S.D. Shinde, APP for the State.
ALONGWITH
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4584 OF 2009
Shri Annaso Balaso Patil .... Applicant.
V/s
The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent.
Mr. Tushar Pimle for the applicant.
Mrs. S.D. Shinde, APP for the State.
CORAM: V.M. KANADE, J. DATE : 7TH NOVEMBER, 2009
2
P.C.:
3
of Rs 5000/- each with one or two sureties in the like amount. Both the applicants shall report to the concerned Police Station as and when called.
(V.M. KANADE, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail ought to be granted to both applicants who settled their dispute.
Sachin Ramgonda Patil
Annaso Balaso Patil
The State of Maharashtra
V.M. Kanade
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
