Kishanchand Jethanand Ramnan and Anr. v. Sumesh Bharatbhushan Agarwal and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The applicant withdrew prosecution of the pending criminal application. The High Court disposed of the application for non-prosecution.
The applicant withdrew prosecution of the pending criminal application. The High Court disposed of the application for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
abs
FARAD CONTINUATION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3965 OF 2009
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders
Court's or Judge's Orders
Mr. A.S. Khandeparkar i/b Ms. Aruna Ghadge for the applicant.
Ms. S.V. Gajare, A.P.P. for the State.
CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, JJ.
DATE : 11TH NOVEMBER 2009
P.C. :
that he does not want to prosecute the application. The application is disposed of for non-prosecution.
(D.G. KARNIK, J.)
The Applicant
The State
D.G. KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court