SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
Applications allowed to be withdrawn by applicant and disposed of; interim relief vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s orders.
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.; 3390 OF 2007
Vikram S/o Maruti Anarse Versus
The State of Maharashtra and another.
Mr. N. V. Gaware, Advocate for the Applicant. Mrs. B. R. Khekale, A.G.P. for the Respondent/ State. Mr. N.C.Garud, Advocate for Respondent No.2.
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.: 3391 OF 2007
Vikram S/o Maruti Anarse
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and another.
Mr. N. V. Gaware, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. P. M. Shinde, A.P.P. for the Respondent/ State. Mr. N.C.Garud, Advocate for Respondent No.2.
respective parties. Since matter is worked out between the litigants, Mr. Gavare is allowed to withdraw the applications. It is accordingly disposed of. Interim relief vacated.
[K. U. CHANDIWAL, J.]
Dated:28/07/2009. ans/3390
Vikram S/o Maruti Anarse
The State of Maharashtra
The State
K. U. Chandiwala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
