This applicant sought bail for offences of murder and affray. Bail was rejected due to identification evidence and lack of case for bail. Sessions Court directed to decide expeditiously with liberty to apply if delayed.
Application for bail rejected. Sessions Court directed to decide case expeditiously.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2959 OF 2009
Gyanendra Sonailal Saroj
.... Applicant.
V/s
State of Maharashtra
.... Respondent.
Mr. Sachindra B. Shetty with Mr. Irfan A. Shaikh for the applicant. Mr. H.J. Dedhia, APP for the State.
CORAM: V. M. KANADE, J. DATE : 10TH DECEMBER, 2009
P.C.:-
2
assaulted the deceased. No case, therefore, is made out for grant of bail at this stage.
4. Application is disposed of.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted in an arrest case involving offences under sections 143, 147, 148, 149, 504, 323, 324, and 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
Whether the Sessions Court should decide the sessions case expeditiously if not already done.
Gyanendra Sonailal Saroj
State of Maharashtra
V. M. Kanade
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
