Rakesh Rudhya Bhil v. the State of Mah
Case brief
What is this about?
C.R. High Court rejected the accused-applicant's bail application in a case involving sections 363, 366, and 376 r/w 34 IPC. The court held that entertaining bail would injure the victim, directed expedition of trial within three months, and directed the accused not to protract proceedings.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANTABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2043 OF 2009
Rakesh s/o Rudhya Bhil
..Applicant.
V E R S U S
The State of Maharashtra.
...Respondent
Shri C.R. Deshpande, Advocate for applicant. Shri P.M. Shinde, APP for Respondent
CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 21ST JULY, 2009.
PER COURT :-
- Heard the counsel for the accused-applicant and learned A.P.P.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted in a case involving alleged kidnapping and sexual intercourse with a minor.
Whether the existence of love affairs negates the possibility of forceful sexual intercourse at the bail stage.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Rakesh s/o Rudhya Bhil
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
K.U. Chandiwal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court