This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
abs
FARAD CONTINUATION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1893 of 2009
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders
Court's or Judge's Orders
Ms. Nayana Orak i/b Mr. Nimish Desai for the applicants.
Mr. Archit Sakhalkar with Mr. Nihar Ghag i/b Mr. Gaurao Belosay for respondent no.2.
Ms. M.H. Mhatre, A.P.P. for the State.
CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, JJ. DATE : 16TH NOVEMBER 2009
P.C. :
applicants and reports no instructions. No other advocate duly instructed by the applicants is present. The applicants are also absent when
called. The application is dismissed for nonprosecution.
(D.G. KARNIK, J.)
Nayana Orak
Respondent no.2
State
D.G. KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
