In a criminal application regarding delay in trial, the Court held that as one co-accused absconded despite bail, the State must apply for separation of trial to avoid unnecessary delay against remaining accused.
State directed to apply for separation of trial and conduct trial against remaining accused expeditiously.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
abs
FARAD CONTINUATION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1865 OF 2009
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of
Court's or Judge's Orders
Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders
Mrs. Nasreen Ayubi, advocate appointed for the applicant.
Ms. M.H. Mhatre, A.P.P. for the State.
CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, JJ.
DATE : 25TH NOVEMBER 2009
P.C. :
2
(D.G. KARNIK, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
What steps the State must take when trial is delayed due to an accused jumping bail and absconding.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
unknown applicant
State
D.G. KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
