Mahadeo Jagannath Magre v. the State of Mah
Case brief
What is this about?
Single Judge, appealing counsel and father-in-law of victim, no separate opinion. Bail granted to Mahadeo Jagannath Magre with conditions, subject to terms and reporting requirements to police and court.
What did the court decide?
Bail allowed on furnishing of P.R. bond and surety with requirement of attendance at Police Station and Court proceedings.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1851/2009 WITH
C.A. NO. 121/2009
(Mahadeo Jagannath Magre Vs. The State)
Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or
Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s
or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders
Mr. N.S.Ghanekar, Adv., for the
applicant.
Mr. P.M.Shinde, APP for
respondent State.
...
CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE: 24/7/2009
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant bail to the father-in-law of the victim in a case involving burn injuries sustained during a matrimonial dispute.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Mahadeo Jagannath Magre
- respondent
The State
- respondent
Bhujang Magre
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court