Criminal Appeal No. 1841 of 2009: The applicant and his counsel were absent on the hearing date as well as the previous adjournment date. The court dismissed the application for non-prosecution.
Application dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
abs
FARAD CONTINUATION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1841 OF 2009
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders
Court's or Judge's Orders
None for the applicant.
Mr. Satish Ingale i/b Mr. Gurunath Sadavarte for respondent no.1.
Ms. M.H. Mhatre, A.P.P. for the State.
CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, JJ. DATE : 5TH NOVEMBER 2009
P.C. :
the previous date (14th October 2009), none was present for the applicant and the matter was adjourned to today for dismissal. Today also, the applicant and his advocate are absent.
The application is dismissed for nonprosecution.
(D.G. KARNIK, J.)
Applicant
Respondent No. 1
State
D.G. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
