The Single Judge of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, allowed the condonation of a 55-day delay in filing a Criminal Revision Application, finding no deliberate omission by the applicant.
Delay of 55 days in filing the Criminal Revision Application was condoned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1760/2009.
Office notes, office Memoranda of
Coram,appearances, Court’s orders
Court’s or Judge’s orders.
or directions and Registrar’s orders
Mr.K.A.Kadam, Advocate for Applicant;
CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J.
DATE :29th September,2009.
1. Heard learned Counsel.
2. There is delay of 55 days caused in
filing Criminal Revision Application
which is sought to be condoned.
3. The reasons assigned in the application
do not indicate any deliberate ommission
on the part of the applicant in
prosecuting the matter.
4. The delay is condoned, application is
allowed as above.
bdv/cran1760.09
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay of 55 days in filing the Criminal Revision Application should be condoned.
Whether the reasons assigned for the delay indicate a deliberate omission by the applicant.
Applicant
K.U.CHANDIWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court