This single-judge order rejected an application for cancellation of anticipatory bail. The court held that no material existed on record to interfere with the Sessions Court's order, despite allegations of assault on the complainant.
Application for cancellation of bail rejected; no interference with Sessions Court order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
lgc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 151 OF 2009
Ravi Sanjay Tare : Applicant. Versus Bapurao Sayabu More & ors. : Respondents.
Mr.Deepak Shinde for the Applicant. Mr. Vijay Patil for the Respondent Nos.1 to 5. Mrs. S D Shinde APP for the State.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE, J. DATE : 8th December 2009
P.C.
2
[V M KANADE, J]
2 issues framed by the court
Whether there is sufficient material on record to justify cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the respondent.
Whether the injury to complainant group members warrants interference with the Sessions Court's bail order.
Ravi Sanjay Tare
Bapurao Sayabu More
V. M. Kanade
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court