The State of Maharashtra v. Kanha Ramu Naik Rathod and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE…
What did the court decide?
Stay of execution granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
DISTRICT:
Office |
Notes, |
Office |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memorandaappearanceorders orRegistrar’ |
ofs,directs order |
Coram,Court’sions ands. |
Court’s or Judge’s order |
||
Cr |
iminal |
APPLICATION No. 1498 Of 2008----- |
|||
Mr.ProMr.No.Mr.Res |
B.J.secutorG.R.1 & 2A.B.pondent |
Sonwane, Additional Public, for Applicant/ State.Sayed Advocate for RespondentBilolikar Advocate forNo. 3.----- |
|||
1) |
Heard. |
||||
2)sta |
Leavends dis |
Granted. Criminal Applicationposed of. |
|||
(SH |
RIHARI |
P DAVARE,J.)(NARESH H PATIL,J.) |
|||
Datsdm/1 |
ed: 16th 498.08 |
SEPTEMBER 2009 |
State of Maharashtra
Sayed
Bilolikar
P DAVARE
NARESH H PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court