The High Court of Judicature at Bombay rejected a fresh bail application filed by an applicant by observing that an earlier bail application had been rejected and no change in circumstances had occurred.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
25.crn.493.09 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.493 OF 2009 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1035 OF 2008
Harish Ramesh Pulekar. ..Applicant. Versus
The State of Maharashtra.
..Respondent.
Mr.Sandesh D. Patil, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr.A.S. Gadkari, A.P.P., for the Respondent - State.
CORAM : BILAL NAZKI AND A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATE : 8th SEPTEMBER, 2009.
P.C. :-
by this Court. We do not see any change in the circumstances. Hence, application for bail is rejected.
[BILAL NAZKI,J.]
[A.R.JOSHI,J.]
Harish Ramesh Pulekar
The State of Maharashtra
Bilal Nazki
A.R. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
