The High Court stayed the operation of the judgment pronounced on the same day for a period of two weeks in an appeal regarding an arbitration petition.
Stay of the operation of the judgment by a period of two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPEAL NO. 338 OF 2009 IN
ARBITRATION PETITION (LODGING) NO. 493 OF 2009
Girish Mulchand Mehta and another ).. Appellants
Versus
Mahesh S Mehta and another ).. Respondents
Ms. Rajni Iyer, Sr. Advocate, i/b Mr.K.V. Tembe for the Appellants. Mr. D.D. Madon, Sr. Advocate i/b K.J. Hakan for Respondent No.1. Mr. C.J. Sawant, Sr. Advocate i/b Rahul K. Hakani for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J.
A.M. KHANWILKAR, J. DATED : 10TH DECEMBER 2009
P.C.
After the judgment is pronounced in Court, the learned Counsel appearing for the Appellants orally prays for stay of the operation of the judgment.
CHIEF JUSTICE
A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.
Girish Mulchand Mehta and another
Mahesh S Mehta and another
Swatanter Kumar
A.M. Khanwilkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
