The court disposed of an appeal by a consented order. Terms were agreed upon to set aside parts of the impugned order while allowing the notice of motion to be heard on merits, and an earlier inter-im order was continued.
Appeal disposed of by consented order; impugned order set aside partly; ad-interim order continued.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPEAL NO. 9 OF 2009 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1558 OF 2007 IN SUIT NO. 1193 OF 2007
Dr Sunil Rebello
).. Appellant
Versus
Neeraj Maheshwari and another ).. Respondents
Mr U J Makhija i/b Mr Denzil D'mello for the Appellant. Mr R Z Moray a/w Mr Santosh Shetty i/b T S Shetty for the Respondents.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. DATED : 12TH JANUARY 2009
P.C.
The challenge in the present Appeal is to the order dated 2nd June 2008 passed by the learned Single Judge in Notice of Motion No. 1558 of 2007. During the course of hearing, the learned Counsel appearing for the parties agreed that the Appeal could be disposed of by a consented order. The agreed terms are :
aside limited to the extent that, the ad-interim order may continue, but the Notice of Motion may be heard
-2-
by the learned Single Judge on merits.
for the parties to pray before the learned Single Judge
for hearing of the Notice of Motion expeditiously.
CHIEF JUSTICE
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
Dr Sunil Rebello
Neeraj Maheshwari
another
SWATANTER KUMAR
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
