The High Court of Bombay at Bombay disposed of Suit No. 619 of 2002 by terms of settlement. The plaintiff and defendants appeared, confirmed consent terms were within legal framework, and the suit was recorded as settled with liberty reserved.
Suit disposed of by consent terms with liberty; decree to be drawn with refund of court fee if any.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUIT NO. 619 OF 2002
Seema S. Agarwal
...Plaintiff.
Vs.
Laxmi Enterprises & Anr.
...Defendants.
Mr. D.R. Jhuriya for the Plaintiff. None for the Defendants.
CORAM :- ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED :- 20th AUGUST, 2009.
P.C.-
1 On 16th June, 2009, it was recorded that the parties have settled the matter and the consent terms is duly signed by both the parties and the Advocate for the Plaintiff. The matter is listed today under the caption “for filing consent terms”.
the consent terms is well within the framework of law and the record.
(ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
Laxmi Enterprises & Anr.
Anoop V. Mota
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
