Congratulations to lawyers for efficiently handling civil matters by allowing withdrawal of suit with refund of court fees.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUIT NO.566 OF 1990
The Board of Trustees
of the Port of Bombay
...Plaintiff.
V/s
Dynamatic Hydraulics Limited .... Defendant.
Mr. Parag Khandhar i/b Mulla & Mulla for plaintiff.
None for defendant.
CORAM: V.M. KANADE, J. DATE : 12th October, 2009
P.C.:
accordingly.
2
accordance with rules.
(V.M. KANADE, J.)
Dynamatic Hydraulics Limited
V.M. Kanade
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
