This is a thin order where the court recorded plaintiffs' documents, noted the absence of defendant counsel, and decreed the suit as prayed, disposing of the matter.
Suit decreed in terms of prayer clauses (a) to (e); refund of court fees.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUIT NO.3012 OF 1994
Mr. Joseph Da Gama & Anr
.... Plaintiffs.
V/s
Birla Jute & Industries Ltd and Ors.
.... Defendants.
Mr. Rafique Peermohideen with Mr. Saket More i/b M/s Paras Kuhad & Associates for plaintiffs.
None for defendants.
CORAM: V.M. KANADE, J. DATE : 24th September, 2009
P.C.:
2
plaintiffs are taken on record and marked as Exhibits-P1, P2
and P3.
Joseph Da Gama & Anr
Birla Jute & Industries Ltd and Ors
V.M. Kanade
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
