In a suit for withdrawal, the court allowed the plaintiff to withdraw the suit and dismissed it, ordering refund of court fees.
Suit allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed; refund of court fees ordered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUIT NO.2695 OF 1984
Sumermal Mishrimal Bafna.. Plaintiff
Versus
The Prithvi Vandan Coop.
Housing Society & Anr... Defendants
Ms.N.Butalkar i/b. Vivek Kantawala for plaintiff
Mr.V.S.Kapse for defendants.
CORAM :S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.
DATE:16th March 2009.
P.C.
.Learned Advocate for plaintiffs states
that she has instructions to withdraw the suit.
In the light of this statement, the suit is
allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.
Refund of court fees as per rules.
(S.C.Dharmadhikari, J)
The Prithvi Vandan Coop. Housing Society & Anr
S.C. Dharmadhikari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court