The plaintiff was absent from court and no counsel reported instructions. The suit was dismissed as per Order 9 Rule 8 CPC for non-appearance without condonation.
Suit dismissed under Order 9 Rule 8 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
mpt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUIT NO. 2459 of 1991
Manerkar Fisheries P.Ltd. & Anr. .. Plaintiffs
versus
Elco Computers Pvt.Ltd.
.. Defendant
Mr.Rakesh Misar i/b S. Mohamadbhai & Co. for the
plaintiffs.
Mr.Anil Nagwani for the defendant.
CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J
DATED : 4th May 2009
P.C.:
1.Learned counsel for the plaintiff reports no
instructions. No other advocate duly instructed by
the plaintiff is present. Plaintiff is also absent.
Suit is dismissed under Order 9 Rule 8 of the Code of
Civil Procedure.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
D.G. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court