The High Court at Bombay granted the plaintiff leave to withdraw suit No. 2284 of 2005 after hearing counsel, upon the submission that the parties had settled the matter out of court. The suit and a Notice of Motion were disposed of.
Leave to withdraw suit No. 2284 of 2005 granted; suit and Notice of Motion disposed of; court fees refund directed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUIT NO. 2284 OF 2005
Sunil Chandra Roy
vs.
UTI Bank Ltd. & Ors.
...Plaintiff
...Defendants
Ms.Vandana for the Plaintiff.
None for the Defendants.
CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J.
DATED : SEPTEMBER 16, 2009
P.C. :-
Counsel appearing on behalf of the
plaintiff submits that the parties have settled the
matter out court. She seeks leave to withdraw the
suit.
Suit is allowed to be withdrawn and is
disposed of. Refund of Court fees be paid in
accordance with Rules. Notice of Motion No.1938/2008
does not survive and it is disposed of.
(V.M. KANADE, J.)
V.M. KANADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court