M/S. Armour Pharmaceuticals Co. Ltd. v. M/S. Walter Bushnell P. Ltd. and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Suit dismissed for non-prosecution. Counsel for plaintiff was absent.
What did the court decide?
Suit dismissed for non-prosecution.
Suit dismissed for non-prosecution. Counsel for plaintiff was absent.
Suit dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2058-88.sxw
kbp
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUIT NO. 2058 OF 1988
M/s.Armour Pharmacutical Company Limited
..Plaintiff
Vs.
M/s.Walter Bushnell Pvt. Ltd. and ors. ..Defendants
None for plaintiff.
Mr.A.L.Wachasunder, i/b.M/s.L.J.Law, for defendants.
CORAM : A.S.OKA, J.. DATE : 30th November, 2009.
P.C. :
1] None appears for the plaintiff. Counsel for the first defendant is present.
The suit dismissed for non prosecution.
( A.S.OKA, J. )
A.S.OKA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court