Suit dismissed for want of prosecution as the plaintiff's counsel stated he had no instructions and papers were returned to the client.
Suit dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O. O. C. J.
SUIT NO.1929 OF 1997
..Plaintiffs.
Jyotsna Mansukhlal Kotak and another ..Plaintiffs. Vs. Purshottam Revabhai Patel and others ..Defendants.
Mr. J.S. Shukla i/b Divyakant Mehta & Associates for the Plaintiffs. None for the Defendants.
CORAM: DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
P.C. :
The learned advocate appearing on behalf of the Plaintiffs states
that papers have already been returned to the client and that he has no
instructions in the matter. In these circumstances, the Court is
constrained to dismiss the suit for want of prosecution.
Jyotsna Mansukhlal Kotak and another
Purshottam Revabhai Patel and others
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
