Suit dismissed for want of prosecution as the plaintiff's counsel was unable to secure instructions or contact the plaintiff.
Suit dismissed for lack of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O. O. C. J.
SUIT NO.1432 OF 1998
Mahendra Chaurasia
..Plaintiff.
Vs.
M/s. ACE Agro Products Pvt.Ltd. and others ..Defendants.
Mr. A.N. Jakhadi for the Plaintiff. Mr. Y. Divekar i/b Divekar & Co. for the Defendants.
CORAM : DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
8th July, 2009.
P.C. :
The learned advocate appearing on behalf of the Plaintiff states that several efforts have been made to contact the Plaintiff; No instructions have been forthcoming and the Plaintiff appears to have changed the location of their office without furnishing any intimation. In these circumstances, since the learned advocate has no instructions and he has
been unable to contact the Plaintiff despite due efforts, the Court is constrained to dismiss the suit for want of prosecution.
Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
