Shmalal C. Chadha v. Manoharlal C. Chadna and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Suit disposed of by consent settlement introduced by counsel; consent terms taken on record and marked as evidence; no merits adjudicated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J.
SUIT NO.1292 OF 1998
Shamlal Chamanlal Chadha. Vs. Manoharlal Chamanlal Chadha & Ors.
...Plaintiff.
...Defendants.
Mr.Nusrat Shah i/b. Smt. N.N. Shah for the Plaintiff. Mr. Suresh Gole for Defendant No.1. Mr. B.D. Kulkarni with Mr. A.K. Gupta for Defendant Nos.2 to 9.
CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.
September 30, 2009.
P.C.
Counsel appearing on behalf of the Plaintiff and the Defendants have tendered Consent Terms signed by the parties and by their respective Advocates. The Consent Terms are taken on record and marked `X'. Counsel state that the dispute is settled in terms thereof. The suit stands disposed of in terms of the Consent Terms.
Shamlal Chamanlal Chadha
Manoharlal Chamanlal Chadha
D.Y.Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court