Plaintiff appeared in person to withdraw Suit No. 1164 of 1983. The court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the suit with refund of court fees and vacation of interim orders.
Withdrawal of suit allowed; suit dismissed; court fees refunded; interim orders vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY & ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUIT NO. 1164 OF 1983
Chandrakant Mulraj. V/s.
... Plaintiff.
The Tata Engineering & Locomotive Co. Ltd. ... Defendant.
Mr. Chandrakant Mulraj, Plaintiff present in-person. None for the Defendant.
CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J.
DATED : 08th SEPTEMBER 2009.
P.C. :-
The Plaintiff appears in person and states that he wants to withdraw the Suit. In the light of this statement made by him and since he is appearing in person, the Suit is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such. No order as to costs. Refund of Court fees as per rules. Interim order, if any, to stand vacated. All proceedings including originating summons, if any, stand disposed off.
(S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J.)
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
