The High Court of Bombay dismissed three criminal writ petitions as withdrawn upon the application of the learned Counsel for the Petitioners. The court expressly kept all pending contentions open.
Petitions dismissed as withdrawn; contentions of Petitioners kept open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.94 OF 2008.
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.95 OF 2008
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.96 OF 2008.
..............................................................
Office Notes, Office
memorandum of Coram,
appearances, Court’sCourt’s or
orders or directionsJudge’s orders.
& Registrar’s orders.
Ms.Anjali Iyer, for the Petitioner, in
Crim.W.P.No.94/2008.
Mr.G.W.Mattos, for the Respondent No.1,
in Crim.W.P.No.94/2008.
Mr.Y.S.Shinde, APP, for the
Respondent-State, in Crim.W.P.No.94/2008.
CORAM: A.S.OKA,J.
DATE : 25TH AUGUST, 2008.
P.C.:
1.The learned Counsel appearing for
the Petitioners seeks permission to
withdraw these Petitions. The Petitions
are dismissed as withdrawn.
2.All contentions of the Petitioners
in pending proceeding are expressly kept
open.
Petitioner
Respondent No.1
Respondent-State
A.S.OKA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court