The High Court refused to entertain a criminal writ petition, directing the petitioner to approach the Magistrate's Court by filing a private complaint instead, and rejected the petition.
Petitioner directed to file a private complaint with the Magistrate's Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 92 OF 2008
Mr. Pannalal Rajnarayan Yadav ] .. Petitioner
Versus
1. State of Maharashtra & 2 Ors. ] .. Respondent
Mr. R.N. Kachave for the petitioner.
Mr. A.R. Patil, APP, for the respondents No.1 & 2.
CORAM: S.B. MHASE &
SMT.V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ.
DATED: 28TH JANUARY, 2008
P.C. :
1. Perused the complaint. The petitioner may
approach the Magistrate’s Court by filing private
complaint. We refuse to entertain the Petition and it
is, accordingly, rejected.
Sd/- Sd/-
[SMT.V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.] [S.B. MHASE, J.]
Pannalal Rajnarayan Yadav
State of Maharashtra
Respondent 2
S.B. MHASE
V.K. TAHILRAMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court