rent was for the period June 1971 to December 1975 and the
second receipt was for the period from January 1972 to August
1978. It is alleged that the receipts have been fraudulently
issued with common intention to cause wrongful loss to the
petitioner and false documents have been made by the first
accused at the inducement of the petitioner who stands to
benefit most out of the said documents. The allegation is
that accused no.1 committed forgery in respect of the said two
receipts. It is alleged that the receipts were forged with
common intention to cause loss to the 1st respondent. On the
said private complaint, the learned Magistrate had called for
the report under section 156 (3) of the Code of Criminal
Procedure,1973. After perusing the report, the learned
Magistrate directed the first Respondent to adduce evidence.
Accordingly, the evidence was adduced by the first Respondent
by examining the witnesses. By order dated 2nd September
1997, the learned Metropolitan Magistrate held that a
primafacie case was made out for offences under section 465,
469, 460 of the Indian Penal Code against the accused No.1 and
not against the petitioner. He held that a prima facie case
under section 471 of the Indian Penal Code was made out
against the petitioner. A revision application was filed by
the petitioner for challenging the said order. By the
impugned Judgment and Order dated 27th October 1998, the
Revision Application has been dismissed.
