Leena Vinod Sawale v. the Collector, Nashik and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition withdrawn and dismissed as withdrawn by a single-paragraph order without substantive reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 6531 OF 2008
Smt.Leena Vinod Sawale ..... ...... ......Petitioner V/s The Collector, Nashik & Anr...... ...... ......Respondents.
Mr.Afroz Shah i/by Ms.Rutuja Ambekar, Adv. For the petitioner. Mr.V.P.Malvankar AGP For the respondent No.1. Mr.R.M.Nakhwa i/by Vasant Dhavan, Adv. For respondent No.2.
CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J . & A.P.DESHPANDE, J. DATED: 23rd SEPTEMBER, 2008.
PC:
Learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the writ
petition. Permission granted. Writ petition allowed to be withdrawn. Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
CHIEF JUSTICE
A.P.DESHPANDE, J.
Smt. Leena Vinod Sawale
The Collector, Nashik
Swatanter Kumar
A.P. Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court